Oxford Street Pedestrianisation: A Potential Game-Changer for London Real Estate?
London's Oxford Street, one of the most famous shopping destinations in the world, is on the verge of a dramatic transformation. Sadiq Khan has (again) announced plans to ban traffic from the street, reviving a long-debated vision of turning the retail artery into a fully pedestrianised zone. Potentially leveraging the new newly appointed Labour government, Khan hopes to reverse the fortunes of Oxford Street. One could argue that the tide has already turned for Oxford Street with strong occupational demand and rapidly increasing rental tone, but more of that to follow.
This decision could send ripples through the real estate and retail sectors, raising key questions about the future of property values, investment potential, and the street's overall desirability as a shopping destination. While the move promises to rejuvenate the area and boost footfall, it also sparks debate over the balance between accessibility and commercial appeal.
The pandemic, coupled with the closure of iconic department stores like Debenhams and House of Fraser, left a number of vacancies on the mile-long street. While there was a short-term proliferation of American candy shops and souvenir stores, this was never going to last long-term.
For real estate investors and developers, this downturn represented both a challenge and an opportunity. On one hand, the closure of large retail spaces contributed to a dip in property values, as footfall declined and high-profile tenants moved out. On the other, and this is a significant, it created space for redevelopment and new types of tenants, provided there was a strong vision for the street's revival.
Historically, pedestrian zones in major cities have been associated with higher footfall, increased spending, and greater property values. Take, for instance, the recently widened pedestrian areas of Regent Street or Carnaby Street, both of which have benefited from limiting traffic access, creating a more appealing environment for visitors and higher demand for retail spaces.
Pedestrianisation would also align with shifting consumer preferences. More and more shoppers are looking for experiences that blend shopping, leisure, and entertainment. By reducing traffic congestion and noise, Oxford Street could become a more pleasant environment for outdoor cafes, pop-up shops, and cultural events, which in turn would attract a broader demographic. For real estate developers and investors, this means a potential rise in demand for both retail spaces and adjacent residential or mixed-use properties.
Moreover, Khan’s vision promises to go beyond simple pedestrianisation. The potential for creating new green spaces, improved public amenities, and enhanced architectural aesthetics could further boost the attractiveness of the area. Investors eyeing redevelopment opportunities could see a surge in property values, especially as more retailers and leisure operators vie for space in a revitalised Oxford Street.
However, not everyone is in favour with the plan. Westminster Council, which has invested two years 90m into its own redevelopment proposals, expressed concerns over Khan's pedestrianisation initiative. The council’s plan, already “shovel-ready” and backed by some local businesses and residents, emphasises maintaining bus routes and direct access to Oxford Street—a crucial point for many, including disabled and elderly shoppers.
The concern is that cutting off traffic completely could alienate key consumer groups who rely on public transportation or taxis for their shopping trips. With Westminster’s redevelopment plans focusing on improved lighting, seating, and pedestrian crossings, there is a clear effort to make Oxford Street more attractive without fully closing it off to buses and taxis. The conflict between the two visions highlights a tension between making the street a destination for foot traffic while maintaining its accessibility to all.
For real estate investors, this debate over accessibility versus pedestrianisation raises key questions. Will restricting traffic boost retail sales enough to justify the inconvenience for certain shoppers? Will foot traffic from tourists and younger shoppers offset the potential loss of key demographics who rely on public transportation? The answers to these questions will significantly influence the trajectory of Oxford Street’s real estate market in the coming years.
Despite Westminster Council’s concerns, many retailers have cautiously welcomed the announcement. Retailers such as John Lewis have expressed optimism, noting that pedestrianisation could elevate Oxford Street’s profile back to its historic standing as "the nation’s high street." The New West End Company, representing businesses in the area, has also signalled its support, though it is keen to see swift action to prevent further delays.
From a real estate perspective, the cautious optimism from retailers is a positive sign. Retailers' enthusiasm suggests that they believe pedestrianisation could continue to drive consumer interest and, in turn, boost rental demand for retail spaces. For investors and developers, this could translate into further rising property values along Oxford Street.
The balance between accessibility and pedestrianisation will be critical, as will the ability to execute the vision swiftly and effectively. Any delays or missteps could erode confidence among retailers and real estate investors alike. The statutory consultation and approvals process, along with the need for collaboration between the mayor’s office, Westminster Council, and local businesses, will ultimately determine the project’s success.
In the meantime, Oxford Street's future as a pedestrian paradise remains a tantalising prospect—one that could redefine not only London’s retail landscape but also its real estate market for decades to come.
Image credit: Unsplash